FQAL vs HUSV
vs
FQAL vs HUSV
Fidelity Quality Factor ETF vs First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Domestic ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
FQAL has a lower expense ratio. FQAL delivered stronger 1-year returns. FQAL offers more diversification with 130 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FQAL | HUSV |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | First Trust Portfolios (US) |
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.70% |
| AUM | $1.2B | $75M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 1.31% |
| Holdings Count | 130 | 102 |
| Inception Date | 2016-09-12 | 2016-08-24 |
| Investment Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| 1-Month Return | +1.52% | +1.97% |
| YTD Return | +1.40% | +2.44% |
| 1-Year Return | +15.18% | +3.07% |
| 3-Year Return | +19.11% | +7.82% |
| 5-Year Return | +14.01% | +8.85% |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 74 | 68 |
| Momentum Score | 49 | 46 |
| Value Score | 74 | 48 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, FQAL or HUSV?
FQAL has an expense ratio of 0.15% while HUSV charges 0.70%. FQAL is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do FQAL and HUSV hold the same stocks?
FQAL and HUSV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, FQAL or HUSV?
Over the past year, FQAL returned +15.18% while HUSV returned +3.07%. FQAL outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.