FQAL vs HUSV
vs
FQAL vs HUSV
Fidelity Quality Factor ETF vs First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Domestic ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
FQAL has a lower expense ratio. FQAL delivered stronger 1-year returns. FQAL offers more diversification with 124 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FQAL | HUSV |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | First Trust Portfolios (US) |
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.70% |
| AUM | $1.2B | $75M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 1.31% |
| Holdings Count | 130 | 102 |
| Inception Date | 2016-09-12 | 2016-08-24 |
| Investment Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| 1-Month Return | +1.52% | +1.97% |
| YTD Return | +1.40% | +2.44% |
| 1-Year Return | +15.18% | +3.07% |
| 3-Year Return | +19.11% | +7.82% |
| 5-Year Return | +14.01% | +8.85% |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 74 | 68 |
| Momentum Score | 49 | 46 |
| Value Score | 74 | 48 |
Holdings Overlap
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, FQAL or HUSV?
FQAL has an expense ratio of 0.15% while HUSV charges 0.70%. FQAL is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do FQAL and HUSV hold the same stocks?
FQAL and HUSV share 29 common holdings with a 16.0% weight overlap. They hold 195 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, FQAL or HUSV?
Over the past year, FQAL returned +15.18% while HUSV returned +3.07%. FQAL outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.