FQAL vs IGBH
vs
FQAL vs IGBH
Fidelity Quality Factor ETF vs iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
IGBH has a lower expense ratio. FQAL delivered stronger 1-year returns. IGBH offers more diversification with 280 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FQAL | IGBH |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.14% |
| AUM | $1.4B | $198M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.17% | 5.68% |
| Holdings Count | 129 | 280 |
| Inception Date | 2016-09-12 | 2015-07-22 |
| Investment Style | Large Cap Blend | Ultrashort Term Bond |
| 1-Month Return | +0.04% | -0.35% |
| YTD Return | +7.80% | +1.98% |
| 1-Year Return | +17.86% | +8.04% |
| 3-Year Return | +18.53% | +8.04% |
| 5-Year Return | +11.89% | +5.27% |
| 10-Year Return | - | +4.42% |
| Buy Score | 69 | 60 |
| Momentum Score | 56 | 37 |
| Value Score | 73 | - |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
124
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, FQAL or IGBH?
FQAL has an expense ratio of 0.15% while IGBH charges 0.14%. IGBH is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do FQAL and IGBH hold the same stocks?
FQAL and IGBH share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 124 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, FQAL or IGBH?
Over the past year, FQAL returned +17.86% while IGBH returned +8.04%. FQAL outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.