FQAL vs IGBH
vs
FQAL vs IGBH
Fidelity Quality Factor ETF vs iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
IGBH has a lower expense ratio. FQAL delivered stronger 1-year returns. IGBH offers more diversification with 274 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FQAL | IGBH |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.14% |
| AUM | $1.2B | $174M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 6.09% |
| Holdings Count | 130 | 274 |
| Inception Date | 2016-09-12 | 2015-07-22 |
| Investment Style | Large Cap Blend | Ultrashort Term Bond |
| 1-Month Return | +1.52% | +0.89% |
| YTD Return | +1.40% | +0.85% |
| 1-Year Return | +15.18% | +7.33% |
| 3-Year Return | +19.11% | +7.78% |
| 5-Year Return | +14.01% | +5.04% |
| 10-Year Return | - | +4.61% |
| Buy Score | 74 | 60 |
| Momentum Score | 49 | 41 |
| Value Score | 74 | 63 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, FQAL or IGBH?
FQAL has an expense ratio of 0.15% while IGBH charges 0.14%. IGBH is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do FQAL and IGBH hold the same stocks?
FQAL and IGBH share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, FQAL or IGBH?
Over the past year, FQAL returned +15.18% while IGBH returned +7.33%. FQAL outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.