FQAL vs IZRL
vs
FQAL vs IZRL
Fidelity Quality Factor ETF vs ARK Israel Innovative Technology ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
FQAL has a lower expense ratio. FQAL delivered stronger 1-year returns. FQAL offers more diversification with 124 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FQAL | IZRL |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Ark Invest |
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.49% |
| AUM | $1.4B | $152M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.17% | 2.55% |
| Holdings Count | 129 | 63 |
| Inception Date | 2016-09-12 | 2017-12-04 |
| Investment Style | Large Cap Blend | Small Cap Growth |
| 1-Month Return | +0.04% | -6.80% |
| YTD Return | +7.80% | +1.94% |
| 1-Year Return | +17.86% | +15.44% |
| 3-Year Return | +18.53% | +18.48% |
| 5-Year Return | +11.89% | -0.35% |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 69 | 53 |
| Momentum Score | 56 | 37 |
| Value Score | 73 | 75 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
185
Total Unique
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, FQAL or IZRL?
FQAL has an expense ratio of 0.15% while IZRL charges 0.49%. FQAL is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do FQAL and IZRL hold the same stocks?
FQAL and IZRL share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 185 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, FQAL or IZRL?
Over the past year, FQAL returned +17.86% while IZRL returned +15.44%. FQAL outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.