FQAL vs KF
vs
FQAL vs KF
Fidelity Quality Factor ETF vs The Korea Fund, Inc.
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
KF delivered stronger 1-year returns. FQAL offers more diversification with 124 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FQAL | KF |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | The Korea Fund, Inc. (KF) |
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | - |
| AUM | $1.4B | $332M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.17% | 1.57% |
| Holdings Count | 129 | 52 |
| Inception Date | 2016-09-12 | 1984-08-29 |
| Investment Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| 1-Month Return | +0.04% | +2.16% |
| YTD Return | +7.80% | +101.75% |
| 1-Year Return | +17.86% | +191.01% |
| 3-Year Return | +18.53% | +51.14% |
| 5-Year Return | +11.89% | +18.79% |
| 10-Year Return | - | +18.23% |
| Buy Score | 69 | - |
| Momentum Score | 56 | 96 |
| Value Score | 73 | - |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
173
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, FQAL or KF?
Expense ratio data is not currently available.
Do FQAL and KF hold the same stocks?
FQAL and KF share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 173 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, FQAL or KF?
Over the past year, FQAL returned +17.86% while KF returned +191.01%. KF outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.