FQAL vs MFEM
vs
FQAL vs MFEM
Fidelity Quality Factor ETF vs PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
FQAL has a lower expense ratio. MFEM delivered stronger 1-year returns. MFEM offers more diversification with 693 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FQAL | MFEM |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | PIMCO (US) |
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.49% |
| AUM | $1.2B | $127M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 2.32% |
| Holdings Count | 130 | 772 |
| Inception Date | 2016-09-12 | 2017-08-31 |
| Investment Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| 1-Month Return | +1.52% | +9.42% |
| YTD Return | +1.40% | +7.98% |
| 1-Year Return | +15.18% | +37.08% |
| 3-Year Return | +19.11% | +15.74% |
| 5-Year Return | +14.01% | +7.46% |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 74 | 68 |
| Momentum Score | 49 | 79 |
| Value Score | 74 | 53 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
817
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, FQAL or MFEM?
FQAL has an expense ratio of 0.15% while MFEM charges 0.49%. FQAL is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do FQAL and MFEM hold the same stocks?
FQAL and MFEM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 817 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, FQAL or MFEM?
Over the past year, FQAL returned +15.18% while MFEM returned +37.08%. MFEM outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.