FQAL vs PATN
vs
FQAL vs PATN
Fidelity Quality Factor ETF vs Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
FQAL has a lower expense ratio. PATN delivered stronger 1-year returns. FQAL offers more diversification with 124 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FQAL | PATN |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Pacer ETFs |
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.65% |
| AUM | $1.2B | $54M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 1.89% |
| Holdings Count | 130 | 106 |
| Inception Date | 2016-09-12 | 2024-09-16 |
| Investment Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| 1-Month Return | +1.52% | +9.09% |
| YTD Return | +1.40% | +7.70% |
| 1-Year Return | +15.18% | +46.33% |
| 3-Year Return | +19.11% | - |
| 5-Year Return | +14.01% | - |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 74 | 61 |
| Momentum Score | 48 | 72 |
| Value Score | 74 | 50 |
Holdings Overlap
0.1%
Weight Overlap
1
Shared Holdings
224
Total Unique
Top Shared Holdings
| Ticker | FQAL Weight | PATN Weight |
|---|---|---|
| NMF | 0.42% | 0.09% |
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, FQAL or PATN?
FQAL has an expense ratio of 0.15% while PATN charges 0.65%. FQAL is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do FQAL and PATN hold the same stocks?
FQAL and PATN share 1 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. They hold 224 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, FQAL or PATN?
Over the past year, FQAL returned +15.18% while PATN returned +46.33%. PATN outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.