FQAL vs PATN
vs
FQAL vs PATN
Fidelity Quality Factor ETF vs Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
FQAL has a lower expense ratio. PATN delivered stronger 1-year returns. FQAL offers more diversification with 130 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FQAL | PATN |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Pacer ETFs |
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.65% |
| AUM | $1.2B | $54M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 1.89% |
| Holdings Count | 130 | 106 |
| Inception Date | 2016-09-12 | 2024-09-16 |
| Investment Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| 1-Month Return | +1.52% | +9.09% |
| YTD Return | +1.40% | +7.70% |
| 1-Year Return | +15.18% | +46.33% |
| 3-Year Return | +19.11% | - |
| 5-Year Return | +14.01% | - |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 74 | 61 |
| Momentum Score | 49 | 74 |
| Value Score | 74 | 50 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, FQAL or PATN?
FQAL has an expense ratio of 0.15% while PATN charges 0.65%. FQAL is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do FQAL and PATN hold the same stocks?
FQAL and PATN share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, FQAL or PATN?
Over the past year, FQAL returned +15.18% while PATN returned +46.33%. PATN outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.