FQAL vs SAWS
vs
FQAL vs SAWS
Fidelity Quality Factor ETF vs AAM Sawgrass US Small Cap Quality Growth ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
FQAL has a lower expense ratio. SAWS delivered stronger 1-year returns. FQAL offers more diversification with 124 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FQAL | SAWS |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Advisors Asset Management, Inc. |
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.55% |
| AUM | $1.4B | $8M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.17% | 0.02% |
| Holdings Count | 129 | 72 |
| Inception Date | 2016-09-12 | 2024-07-30 |
| Investment Style | Large Cap Blend | Small Cap Growth |
| 1-Month Return | +0.04% | +11.92% |
| YTD Return | +7.80% | +22.88% |
| 1-Year Return | +17.86% | +32.24% |
| 3-Year Return | +18.53% | - |
| 5-Year Return | +11.89% | - |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 69 | 70 |
| Momentum Score | 56 | 89 |
| Value Score | 73 | - |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
195
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, FQAL or SAWS?
FQAL has an expense ratio of 0.15% while SAWS charges 0.55%. FQAL is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do FQAL and SAWS hold the same stocks?
FQAL and SAWS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 195 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, FQAL or SAWS?
Over the past year, FQAL returned +17.86% while SAWS returned +32.24%. SAWS outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.