FQAL vs SPGM
vs
FQAL vs SPGM
Fidelity Quality Factor ETF vs State Street SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
SPGM has a lower expense ratio. SPGM delivered stronger 1-year returns. SPGM offers more diversification with 2954 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FQAL | SPGM |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | SPDR State Street Global Advisors |
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.09% |
| AUM | $1.2B | $1.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 1.80% |
| Holdings Count | 130 | 2,954 |
| Inception Date | 2016-09-12 | 2012-02-27 |
| Investment Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| 1-Month Return | +1.52% | +3.34% |
| YTD Return | +1.40% | +2.71% |
| 1-Year Return | +15.18% | +23.81% |
| 3-Year Return | +19.11% | +19.04% |
| 5-Year Return | +14.01% | +12.35% |
| 10-Year Return | - | +5.47% |
| Buy Score | 74 | 76 |
| Momentum Score | 49 | 59 |
| Value Score | 74 | 71 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, FQAL or SPGM?
FQAL has an expense ratio of 0.15% while SPGM charges 0.09%. SPGM is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do FQAL and SPGM hold the same stocks?
FQAL and SPGM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, FQAL or SPGM?
Over the past year, FQAL returned +15.18% while SPGM returned +23.81%. SPGM outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.