FQAL vs SPGM
vs
FQAL vs SPGM
Fidelity Quality Factor ETF vs State Street SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
SPGM has a lower expense ratio. SPGM delivered stronger 1-year returns. SPGM offers more diversification with 2834 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FQAL | SPGM |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | SPDR State Street Global Advisors |
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.09% |
| AUM | $1.2B | $1.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 1.80% |
| Holdings Count | 130 | 2,954 |
| Inception Date | 2016-09-12 | 2012-02-27 |
| Investment Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| 1-Month Return | +1.52% | +3.34% |
| YTD Return | +1.40% | +2.71% |
| 1-Year Return | +15.18% | +23.81% |
| 3-Year Return | +19.11% | +19.04% |
| 5-Year Return | +14.01% | +12.35% |
| 10-Year Return | - | +5.47% |
| Buy Score | 74 | 76 |
| Momentum Score | 49 | 59 |
| Value Score | 74 | 71 |
Holdings Overlap
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, FQAL or SPGM?
FQAL has an expense ratio of 0.15% while SPGM charges 0.09%. SPGM is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do FQAL and SPGM hold the same stocks?
FQAL and SPGM share 86 common holdings with a 30.4% weight overlap. They hold 2872 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, FQAL or SPGM?
Over the past year, FQAL returned +15.18% while SPGM returned +23.81%. SPGM outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.