FTGS vs GLOW

vs

Quick Verdict

FTGS has a lower expense ratio. GLOW delivered stronger 1-year returns. FTGS offers more diversification with 50 holdings.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFTGSGLOW
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)Victory Capital Management Inc.
Expense Ratio0.60%0.72%
AUM$1.3B$61M
Dividend Yield0.08%1.28%
Holdings Count5116
Inception Date2022-10-252024-06-21
Investment StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Blend
1-Month Return-1.12%+0.86%
YTD Return+4.73%+11.71%
1-Year Return+8.32%+23.76%
3-Year Return+16.75%-
5-Year Return--
10-Year Return--
Buy Score6758
Momentum Score4469
Value Score72-

Holdings Overlap

0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
65
Total Unique

Sector Allocation

Loading chart...

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has lower fees, FTGS or GLOW?

FTGS has an expense ratio of 0.60% while GLOW charges 0.72%. FTGS is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.

Do FTGS and GLOW hold the same stocks?

FTGS and GLOW share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 65 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Which performed better, FTGS or GLOW?

Over the past year, FTGS returned +8.32% while GLOW returned +23.76%. GLOW outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.