FTGS vs GLOW

vs

Quick Verdict

FTGS has a lower expense ratio. GLOW delivered stronger 1-year returns. FTGS offers more diversification with 51 holdings.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFTGSGLOW
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)Victory Capital Management Inc.
Expense Ratio0.60%0.72%
AUM$1.2B$47M
Dividend Yield0.16%1.43%
Holdings Count5115
Inception Date2022-10-252024-06-21
Investment StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Blend
1-Month Return+1.50%+2.84%
YTD Return+1.44%+3.51%
1-Year Return+10.72%+18.65%
3-Year Return+18.08%-
5-Year Return--
10-Year Return--
Buy Score7157
Momentum Score4764
Value Score6645

Holdings Overlap

0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique

Sector Allocation

Loading chart...

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has lower fees, FTGS or GLOW?

FTGS has an expense ratio of 0.60% while GLOW charges 0.72%. FTGS is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.

Do FTGS and GLOW hold the same stocks?

FTGS and GLOW share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Which performed better, FTGS or GLOW?

Over the past year, FTGS returned +10.72% while GLOW returned +18.65%. GLOW outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.