FTGS vs HUSV

vs

Quick Verdict

FTGS has a lower expense ratio. FTGS delivered stronger 1-year returns. HUSV offers more diversification with 102 holdings.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFTGSHUSV
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)First Trust Portfolios (US)
Expense Ratio0.60%0.70%
AUM$1.2B$75M
Dividend Yield0.16%1.31%
Holdings Count51102
Inception Date2022-10-252016-08-24
Investment StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Blend
1-Month Return+1.50%+1.97%
YTD Return+1.44%+2.44%
1-Year Return+10.72%+3.07%
3-Year Return+18.08%+7.82%
5-Year Return-+8.85%
10-Year Return--
Buy Score7168
Momentum Score4746
Value Score6648

Holdings Overlap

0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique

Sector Allocation

Loading chart...

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has lower fees, FTGS or HUSV?

FTGS has an expense ratio of 0.60% while HUSV charges 0.70%. FTGS is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.

Do FTGS and HUSV hold the same stocks?

FTGS and HUSV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Which performed better, FTGS or HUSV?

Over the past year, FTGS returned +10.72% while HUSV returned +3.07%. FTGS outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.