FTGS vs NMI

vs

Quick Verdict

FTGS has a lower expense ratio. FTGS delivered stronger 1-year returns. NMI offers more diversification with 95 holdings.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFTGSNMI
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)Nuveen
Expense Ratio0.60%0.73%
AUM$1.3B-
Dividend Yield0.08%4.57%
Holdings Count51220
Inception Date2022-10-251988-04-20
Investment StyleLarge Cap GrowthMunicipal Bond
1-Month Return-1.12%+1.09%
YTD Return+4.73%+3.37%
1-Year Return+8.32%+7.44%
3-Year Return+16.75%+4.93%
5-Year Return-+1.16%
10-Year Return-+4.12%
Buy Score6760
Momentum Score4439
Value Score7234

Holdings Overlap

0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
145
Total Unique

Sector Allocation

Loading chart...

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has lower fees, FTGS or NMI?

FTGS has an expense ratio of 0.60% while NMI charges 0.73%. FTGS is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.

Do FTGS and NMI hold the same stocks?

FTGS and NMI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 145 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Which performed better, FTGS or NMI?

Over the past year, FTGS returned +8.32% while NMI returned +7.44%. FTGS outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.