FTGS vs PATN
vs
FTGS vs PATN
First Trust Growth Strength ETF vs Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
FTGS has a lower expense ratio. PATN delivered stronger 1-year returns. PATN offers more diversification with 101 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FTGS | PATN |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Pacer ETFs |
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.65% |
| AUM | $1.2B | $54M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.16% | 1.89% |
| Holdings Count | 51 | 106 |
| Inception Date | 2022-10-25 | 2024-09-16 |
| Investment Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| 1-Month Return | +1.50% | +9.09% |
| YTD Return | +1.44% | +7.70% |
| 1-Year Return | +10.72% | +46.33% |
| 3-Year Return | +18.08% | - |
| 5-Year Return | - | - |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 71 | 61 |
| Momentum Score | 47 | 74 |
| Value Score | 66 | 50 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
151
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, FTGS or PATN?
FTGS has an expense ratio of 0.60% while PATN charges 0.65%. FTGS is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do FTGS and PATN hold the same stocks?
FTGS and PATN share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 151 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, FTGS or PATN?
Over the past year, FTGS returned +10.72% while PATN returned +46.33%. PATN outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.