FTGS vs SAWS
vs
FTGS vs SAWS
First Trust Growth Strength ETF vs AAM Sawgrass US Small Cap Quality Growth ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
SAWS has a lower expense ratio. FTGS delivered stronger 1-year returns. SAWS offers more diversification with 71 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FTGS | SAWS |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Advisors Asset Management, Inc. |
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.55% |
| AUM | $1.2B | $6M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.16% | 0.02% |
| Holdings Count | 51 | 71 |
| Inception Date | 2022-10-25 | 2024-07-30 |
| Investment Style | Large Cap Growth | Small Cap Growth |
| 1-Month Return | +1.50% | +4.06% |
| YTD Return | +1.44% | +3.70% |
| 1-Year Return | +10.72% | +8.69% |
| 3-Year Return | +18.08% | - |
| 5-Year Return | - | - |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 71 | 66 |
| Momentum Score | 47 | 61 |
| Value Score | 66 | 49 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, FTGS or SAWS?
FTGS has an expense ratio of 0.60% while SAWS charges 0.55%. SAWS is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do FTGS and SAWS hold the same stocks?
FTGS and SAWS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, FTGS or SAWS?
Over the past year, FTGS returned +10.72% while SAWS returned +8.69%. FTGS outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.