FTGS vs SAWS
vs
FTGS vs SAWS
First Trust Growth Strength ETF vs AAM Sawgrass US Small Cap Quality Growth ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
SAWS has a lower expense ratio. FTGS delivered stronger 1-year returns. SAWS offers more diversification with 70 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FTGS | SAWS |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Advisors Asset Management, Inc. |
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.55% |
| AUM | $1.2B | $6M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.16% | 0.02% |
| Holdings Count | 51 | 71 |
| Inception Date | 2022-10-25 | 2024-07-30 |
| Investment Style | Large Cap Growth | Small Cap Growth |
| 1-Month Return | +1.50% | +4.06% |
| YTD Return | +1.44% | +3.70% |
| 1-Year Return | +10.72% | +8.69% |
| 3-Year Return | +18.08% | - |
| 5-Year Return | - | - |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 71 | 66 |
| Momentum Score | 47 | 61 |
| Value Score | 66 | 49 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
120
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, FTGS or SAWS?
FTGS has an expense ratio of 0.60% while SAWS charges 0.55%. SAWS is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do FTGS and SAWS hold the same stocks?
FTGS and SAWS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 120 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, FTGS or SAWS?
Over the past year, FTGS returned +10.72% while SAWS returned +8.69%. FTGS outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.