GLOW vs MFEM
vs
GLOW vs MFEM
VictoryShares WestEnd Global Equity ETF vs PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
MFEM has a lower expense ratio. MFEM delivered stronger 1-year returns. MFEM offers more diversification with 693 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GLOW | MFEM |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Victory Capital Management Inc. | PIMCO (US) |
| Expense Ratio | 0.72% | 0.49% |
| AUM | $47M | $127M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.43% | 2.32% |
| Holdings Count | 15 | 772 |
| Inception Date | 2024-06-21 | 2017-08-31 |
| Investment Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| 1-Month Return | +2.84% | +9.42% |
| YTD Return | +3.51% | +7.98% |
| 1-Year Return | +18.65% | +37.08% |
| 3-Year Return | - | +15.74% |
| 5-Year Return | - | +7.46% |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 57 | 68 |
| Momentum Score | 64 | 79 |
| Value Score | 45 | 53 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
707
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, GLOW or MFEM?
GLOW has an expense ratio of 0.72% while MFEM charges 0.49%. MFEM is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do GLOW and MFEM hold the same stocks?
GLOW and MFEM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 707 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, GLOW or MFEM?
Over the past year, GLOW returned +18.65% while MFEM returned +37.08%. MFEM outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.