GLOW vs PATN
vs
GLOW vs PATN
VictoryShares WestEnd Global Equity ETF vs Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
PATN has a lower expense ratio. PATN delivered stronger 1-year returns. PATN offers more diversification with 106 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GLOW | PATN |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Victory Capital Management Inc. | Pacer ETFs |
| Expense Ratio | 0.72% | 0.65% |
| AUM | $47M | $54M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.43% | 1.89% |
| Holdings Count | 15 | 106 |
| Inception Date | 2024-06-21 | 2024-09-16 |
| Investment Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| 1-Month Return | +2.84% | +9.09% |
| YTD Return | +3.51% | +7.70% |
| 1-Year Return | +18.65% | +46.33% |
| 3-Year Return | - | - |
| 5-Year Return | - | - |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 57 | 61 |
| Momentum Score | 64 | 74 |
| Value Score | 45 | 50 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, GLOW or PATN?
GLOW has an expense ratio of 0.72% while PATN charges 0.65%. PATN is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do GLOW and PATN hold the same stocks?
GLOW and PATN share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, GLOW or PATN?
Over the past year, GLOW returned +18.65% while PATN returned +46.33%. PATN outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.