GLOW vs SCHQ
vs
GLOW vs SCHQ
VictoryShares WestEnd Global Equity ETF vs Schwab Long-Term US Treasury ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
SCHQ has a lower expense ratio. GLOW delivered stronger 1-year returns. GLOW offers more diversification with 14 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GLOW | SCHQ |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Victory Capital Management Inc. | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Expense Ratio | 0.72% | 0.03% |
| AUM | $47M | $923M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.43% | 4.43% |
| Holdings Count | 15 | 97 |
| Inception Date | 2024-06-21 | 2019-10-10 |
| Investment Style | Large Cap Blend | Long Term Government Bond |
| 1-Month Return | +2.84% | -0.06% |
| YTD Return | +3.51% | +0.09% |
| 1-Year Return | +18.65% | +4.22% |
| 3-Year Return | - | -1.99% |
| 5-Year Return | - | -6.92% |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 57 | 61 |
| Momentum Score | 64 | 25 |
| Value Score | 45 | 73 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
24
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, GLOW or SCHQ?
GLOW has an expense ratio of 0.72% while SCHQ charges 0.03%. SCHQ is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do GLOW and SCHQ hold the same stocks?
GLOW and SCHQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 24 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, GLOW or SCHQ?
Over the past year, GLOW returned +18.65% while SCHQ returned +4.22%. GLOW outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.