GTOS vs MFEM
vs
GTOS vs MFEM
Invesco Short Duration Total Return Bond ETF vs PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
GTOS has a lower expense ratio. MFEM delivered stronger 1-year returns. MFEM offers more diversification with 693 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GTOS | MFEM |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | PIMCO (US) |
| Expense Ratio | 0.30% | 0.49% |
| AUM | $119M | $127M |
| Dividend Yield | 4.73% | 2.32% |
| Holdings Count | 508 | 772 |
| Inception Date | 2022-12-09 | 2017-08-31 |
| Investment Style | Short Term High Yield Bond | Large Cap Value |
| 1-Month Return | +0.09% | +9.42% |
| YTD Return | +0.04% | +7.98% |
| 1-Year Return | +5.29% | +37.08% |
| 3-Year Return | +4.99% | +15.74% |
| 5-Year Return | - | +7.46% |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 52 | 68 |
| Momentum Score | 26 | 79 |
| Value Score | - | 53 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
973
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, GTOS or MFEM?
GTOS has an expense ratio of 0.30% while MFEM charges 0.49%. GTOS is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do GTOS and MFEM hold the same stocks?
GTOS and MFEM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 973 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, GTOS or MFEM?
Over the past year, GTOS returned +5.29% while MFEM returned +37.08%. MFEM outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.