GTOS vs PATN
vs
GTOS vs PATN
Invesco Short Duration Total Return Bond ETF vs Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
GTOS has a lower expense ratio. PATN delivered stronger 1-year returns. GTOS offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GTOS | PATN |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Pacer ETFs |
| Expense Ratio | 0.30% | 0.65% |
| AUM | $119M | $54M |
| Dividend Yield | 4.73% | 1.89% |
| Holdings Count | 508 | 106 |
| Inception Date | 2022-12-09 | 2024-09-16 |
| Investment Style | Short Term High Yield Bond | Large Cap Blend |
| 1-Month Return | +0.09% | +9.09% |
| YTD Return | +0.04% | +7.70% |
| 1-Year Return | +5.29% | +46.33% |
| 3-Year Return | +4.99% | - |
| 5-Year Return | - | - |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 52 | 61 |
| Momentum Score | 26 | 74 |
| Value Score | - | 50 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, GTOS or PATN?
GTOS has an expense ratio of 0.30% while PATN charges 0.65%. GTOS is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do GTOS and PATN hold the same stocks?
GTOS and PATN share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, GTOS or PATN?
Over the past year, GTOS returned +5.29% while PATN returned +46.33%. PATN outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.