GTOS vs PATN
vs
GTOS vs PATN
Invesco Short Duration Total Return Bond ETF vs Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
GTOS has a lower expense ratio. PATN delivered stronger 1-year returns. GTOS offers more diversification with 280 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GTOS | PATN |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Pacer ETFs |
| Expense Ratio | 0.30% | 0.65% |
| AUM | $119M | $54M |
| Dividend Yield | 4.73% | 1.89% |
| Holdings Count | 508 | 106 |
| Inception Date | 2022-12-09 | 2024-09-16 |
| Investment Style | Short Term High Yield Bond | Large Cap Blend |
| 1-Month Return | +0.09% | +9.09% |
| YTD Return | +0.04% | +7.70% |
| 1-Year Return | +5.29% | +46.33% |
| 3-Year Return | +4.99% | - |
| 5-Year Return | - | - |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 52 | 61 |
| Momentum Score | 26 | 74 |
| Value Score | - | 50 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
381
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, GTOS or PATN?
GTOS has an expense ratio of 0.30% while PATN charges 0.65%. GTOS is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do GTOS and PATN hold the same stocks?
GTOS and PATN share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 381 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, GTOS or PATN?
Over the past year, GTOS returned +5.29% while PATN returned +46.33%. PATN outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.