HCOM vs MFEM
vs
HCOM vs MFEM
Hartford Schroders Commodity Strategy ETF vs PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
MFEM has a lower expense ratio. MFEM delivered stronger 1-year returns. MFEM offers more diversification with 772 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HCOM | MFEM |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Hartford Funds | PIMCO (US) |
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.49% |
| AUM | $9M | $127M |
| Dividend Yield | 10.95% | 2.32% |
| Holdings Count | 55 | 772 |
| Inception Date | 2021-09-14 | 2017-08-31 |
| Investment Style | Commodities | Large Cap Value |
| 1-Month Return | -1.05% | +9.42% |
| YTD Return | +4.57% | +7.98% |
| 1-Year Return | +2.31% | +37.08% |
| 3-Year Return | -5.19% | +15.74% |
| 5-Year Return | - | +7.46% |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 60 | 68 |
| Momentum Score | 55 | 79 |
| Value Score | 65 | 53 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, HCOM or MFEM?
HCOM has an expense ratio of 0.59% while MFEM charges 0.49%. MFEM is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do HCOM and MFEM hold the same stocks?
HCOM and MFEM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, HCOM or MFEM?
Over the past year, HCOM returned +2.31% while MFEM returned +37.08%. MFEM outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.