HCOM vs SCHQ
vs
HCOM vs SCHQ
Hartford Schroders Commodity Strategy ETF vs Schwab Long-Term US Treasury ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
SCHQ has a lower expense ratio. SCHQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHQ offers more diversification with 98 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HCOM | SCHQ |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Hartford Funds | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.03% |
| AUM | $9M | $756M |
| Dividend Yield | 10.95% | 4.73% |
| Holdings Count | 55 | 98 |
| Inception Date | 2021-09-14 | 2019-10-10 |
| Investment Style | Commodities | Long Term Government Bond |
| 1-Month Return | -1.05% | +1.03% |
| YTD Return | +4.57% | +0.99% |
| 1-Year Return | +2.31% | +2.87% |
| 3-Year Return | -5.19% | -0.50% |
| 5-Year Return | - | -5.65% |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 60 | 66 |
| Momentum Score | 36 | 25 |
| Value Score | 57 | - |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, HCOM or SCHQ?
HCOM has an expense ratio of 0.59% while SCHQ charges 0.03%. SCHQ is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do HCOM and SCHQ hold the same stocks?
HCOM and SCHQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, HCOM or SCHQ?
Over the past year, HCOM returned +2.31% while SCHQ returned +2.87%. SCHQ outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.