HUSV vs INCE

vs

Quick Verdict

INCE has a lower expense ratio. INCE delivered stronger 1-year returns. HUSV offers more diversification with 100 holdings.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricHUSVINCE
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)Franklin Templeton Investments (US)
Expense Ratio0.70%0.29%
AUM$75M$108M
Dividend Yield1.31%4.95%
Holdings Count10281
Inception Date2016-08-242016-09-20
Investment StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Value
1-Month Return+1.97%+4.05%
YTD Return+2.44%+9.87%
1-Year Return+3.07%+21.86%
3-Year Return+7.82%+17.31%
5-Year Return+8.85%+13.21%
10-Year Return--
Buy Score6878
Momentum Score4688
Value Score4859

Holdings Overlap

10.4%
Weight Overlap
11
Shared Holdings
130
Total Unique

Top Shared Holdings

TickerHUSV WeightINCE Weight
JNJ1.66%2.95%
XOM0.70%3.75%
PG1.50%2.78%
KO2.69%1.43%
CVX0.65%3.11%
VZ1.04%2.54%
MCD1.66%1.11%
APD0.57%1.57%
ACN1.45%0.65%
HD0.61%1.06%

Sector Allocation

Loading chart...

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has lower fees, HUSV or INCE?

HUSV has an expense ratio of 0.70% while INCE charges 0.29%. INCE is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.

Do HUSV and INCE hold the same stocks?

HUSV and INCE share 11 common holdings with a 10.4% weight overlap. They hold 130 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Which performed better, HUSV or INCE?

Over the past year, HUSV returned +3.07% while INCE returned +21.86%. INCE outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.