HUSV vs INCE

vs

Quick Verdict

INCE has a lower expense ratio. INCE delivered stronger 1-year returns. HUSV offers more diversification with 102 holdings.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricHUSVINCE
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)Franklin Templeton Investments (US)
Expense Ratio0.70%0.29%
AUM$75M$108M
Dividend Yield1.31%4.95%
Holdings Count10281
Inception Date2016-08-242016-09-20
Investment StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Value
1-Month Return+1.97%+4.05%
YTD Return+2.44%+9.87%
1-Year Return+3.07%+21.86%
3-Year Return+7.82%+17.31%
5-Year Return+8.85%+13.21%
10-Year Return--
Buy Score6878
Momentum Score4688
Value Score4859

Holdings Overlap

0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique

Sector Allocation

Loading chart...

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has lower fees, HUSV or INCE?

HUSV has an expense ratio of 0.70% while INCE charges 0.29%. INCE is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.

Do HUSV and INCE hold the same stocks?

HUSV and INCE share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Which performed better, HUSV or INCE?

Over the past year, HUSV returned +3.07% while INCE returned +21.86%. INCE outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.