HUSV vs MFEM
vs
HUSV vs MFEM
First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Domestic ETF vs PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
MFEM has a lower expense ratio. MFEM delivered stronger 1-year returns. MFEM offers more diversification with 699 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HUSV | MFEM |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | PIMCO (US) |
| Expense Ratio | 0.70% | 0.49% |
| AUM | $74M | $145M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.33% | 2.14% |
| Holdings Count | 101 | 730 |
| Inception Date | 2016-08-24 | 2017-08-31 |
| Investment Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| 1-Month Return | +0.67% | -5.75% |
| YTD Return | +2.05% | +20.38% |
| 1-Year Return | -1.06% | +36.47% |
| 3-Year Return | +7.32% | +20.04% |
| 5-Year Return | +5.77% | +7.58% |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 51 | 81 |
| Momentum Score | 30 | 84 |
| Value Score | 57 | 52 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
799
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, HUSV or MFEM?
HUSV has an expense ratio of 0.70% while MFEM charges 0.49%. MFEM is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do HUSV and MFEM hold the same stocks?
HUSV and MFEM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 799 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, HUSV or MFEM?
Over the past year, HUSV returned -1.06% while MFEM returned +36.47%. MFEM outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.