HUSV vs NMI

vs

Quick Verdict

HUSV has a lower expense ratio. NMI delivered stronger 1-year returns. HUSV offers more diversification with 100 holdings.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricHUSVNMI
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)Nuveen
Expense Ratio0.70%0.73%
AUM$74M-
Dividend Yield1.33%4.57%
Holdings Count101220
Inception Date2016-08-241988-04-20
Investment StyleLarge Cap BlendMunicipal Bond
1-Month Return+0.67%+1.09%
YTD Return+2.05%+3.37%
1-Year Return-1.06%+7.44%
3-Year Return+7.32%+4.93%
5-Year Return+5.77%+1.16%
10-Year Return-+4.12%
Buy Score5160
Momentum Score3039
Value Score5734

Holdings Overlap

0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
195
Total Unique

Sector Allocation

Loading chart...

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has lower fees, HUSV or NMI?

HUSV has an expense ratio of 0.70% while NMI charges 0.73%. HUSV is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.

Do HUSV and NMI hold the same stocks?

HUSV and NMI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 195 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Which performed better, HUSV or NMI?

Over the past year, HUSV returned -1.06% while NMI returned +7.44%. NMI outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.