HUSV vs PATN
vs
HUSV vs PATN
First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Domestic ETF vs Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
PATN has a lower expense ratio. PATN delivered stronger 1-year returns. PATN offers more diversification with 101 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HUSV | PATN |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Pacer ETFs |
| Expense Ratio | 0.70% | 0.65% |
| AUM | $75M | $54M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.31% | 1.89% |
| Holdings Count | 102 | 106 |
| Inception Date | 2016-08-24 | 2024-09-16 |
| Investment Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| 1-Month Return | +1.97% | +9.09% |
| YTD Return | +2.44% | +7.70% |
| 1-Year Return | +3.07% | +46.33% |
| 3-Year Return | +7.82% | - |
| 5-Year Return | +8.85% | - |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 68 | 61 |
| Momentum Score | 46 | 74 |
| Value Score | 48 | 50 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
201
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, HUSV or PATN?
HUSV has an expense ratio of 0.70% while PATN charges 0.65%. PATN is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do HUSV and PATN hold the same stocks?
HUSV and PATN share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 201 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, HUSV or PATN?
Over the past year, HUSV returned +3.07% while PATN returned +46.33%. PATN outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.