HUSV vs SCHQ

vs

Quick Verdict

SCHQ has a lower expense ratio. SCHQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. HUSV offers more diversification with 102 holdings.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricHUSVSCHQ
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)Charles Schwab Asset Management
Expense Ratio0.70%0.03%
AUM$75M$923M
Dividend Yield1.31%4.43%
Holdings Count10297
Inception Date2016-08-242019-10-10
Investment StyleLarge Cap BlendLong Term Government Bond
1-Month Return+1.97%-0.06%
YTD Return+2.44%+0.09%
1-Year Return+3.07%+4.22%
3-Year Return+7.82%-1.99%
5-Year Return+8.85%-6.92%
10-Year Return--
Buy Score6861
Momentum Score4625
Value Score4873

Holdings Overlap

0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique

Sector Allocation

Loading chart...

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has lower fees, HUSV or SCHQ?

HUSV has an expense ratio of 0.70% while SCHQ charges 0.03%. SCHQ is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.

Do HUSV and SCHQ hold the same stocks?

HUSV and SCHQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Which performed better, HUSV or SCHQ?

Over the past year, HUSV returned +3.07% while SCHQ returned +4.22%. SCHQ outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.