HUSV vs SCHQ

vs

Quick Verdict

SCHQ has a lower expense ratio. SCHQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. HUSV offers more diversification with 100 holdings.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricHUSVSCHQ
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)Charles Schwab Asset Management
Expense Ratio0.70%0.03%
AUM$75M$923M
Dividend Yield1.31%4.43%
Holdings Count10297
Inception Date2016-08-242019-10-10
Investment StyleLarge Cap BlendLong Term Government Bond
1-Month Return+1.97%-0.06%
YTD Return+2.44%+0.09%
1-Year Return+3.07%+4.22%
3-Year Return+7.82%-1.99%
5-Year Return+8.85%-6.92%
10-Year Return--
Buy Score6861
Momentum Score4625
Value Score4873

Holdings Overlap

0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
110
Total Unique

Sector Allocation

Loading chart...

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has lower fees, HUSV or SCHQ?

HUSV has an expense ratio of 0.70% while SCHQ charges 0.03%. SCHQ is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.

Do HUSV and SCHQ hold the same stocks?

HUSV and SCHQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 110 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Which performed better, HUSV or SCHQ?

Over the past year, HUSV returned +3.07% while SCHQ returned +4.22%. SCHQ outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.