HUSV vs SPGM

vs

Quick Verdict

SPGM has a lower expense ratio. SPGM delivered stronger 1-year returns. SPGM offers more diversification with 2834 holdings.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricHUSVSPGM
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)SPDR State Street Global Advisors
Expense Ratio0.70%0.09%
AUM$75M$1.5B
Dividend Yield1.31%1.80%
Holdings Count1022,954
Inception Date2016-08-242012-02-27
Investment StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
1-Month Return+1.97%+3.34%
YTD Return+2.44%+2.71%
1-Year Return+3.07%+23.81%
3-Year Return+7.82%+19.04%
5-Year Return+8.85%+12.35%
10-Year Return-+5.47%
Buy Score6876
Momentum Score4659
Value Score4871

Holdings Overlap

12.0%
Weight Overlap
53
Shared Holdings
2881
Total Unique

Top Shared Holdings

TickerHUSV WeightSPGM Weight
MSFT1.53%3.68%
KO2.69%0.27%
CSCO2.46%0.37%
TDY2.76%0.03%
BRK.B1.62%0.66%
JNJ1.66%0.40%
CTSH1.89%0.09%
LIN:IE1.75%0.23%
TJX1.58%0.36%
WM1.70%0.19%

Sector Allocation

Loading chart...

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has lower fees, HUSV or SPGM?

HUSV has an expense ratio of 0.70% while SPGM charges 0.09%. SPGM is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.

Do HUSV and SPGM hold the same stocks?

HUSV and SPGM share 53 common holdings with a 12.0% weight overlap. They hold 2881 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Which performed better, HUSV or SPGM?

Over the past year, HUSV returned +3.07% while SPGM returned +23.81%. SPGM outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.