IG vs MFEM
vs
IG vs MFEM
Principal Investment Grade Corporate Active ETF vs PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
IG has a lower expense ratio. MFEM delivered stronger 1-year returns. MFEM offers more diversification with 693 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IG | MFEM |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Principal Funds | PIMCO (US) |
| Expense Ratio | 0.19% | 0.49% |
| AUM | $166M | $127M |
| Dividend Yield | 4.97% | 2.32% |
| Holdings Count | 231 | 772 |
| Inception Date | 2018-04-18 | 2017-08-31 |
| Investment Style | Long Term Mid Quality | Large Cap Value |
| 1-Month Return | +0.38% | +9.42% |
| YTD Return | +0.43% | +7.98% |
| 1-Year Return | +7.39% | +37.08% |
| 3-Year Return | +4.29% | +15.74% |
| 5-Year Return | -0.34% | +7.46% |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 70 | 68 |
| Momentum Score | 35 | 79 |
| Value Score | 58 | 53 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
875
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, IG or MFEM?
IG has an expense ratio of 0.19% while MFEM charges 0.49%. IG is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do IG and MFEM hold the same stocks?
IG and MFEM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 875 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, IG or MFEM?
Over the past year, IG returned +7.39% while MFEM returned +37.08%. MFEM outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.