IG vs PATN
vs
IG vs PATN
Principal Investment Grade Corporate Active ETF vs Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
IG has a lower expense ratio. PATN delivered stronger 1-year returns. IG offers more diversification with 231 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IG | PATN |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Principal Funds | Pacer ETFs |
| Expense Ratio | 0.19% | 0.65% |
| AUM | $166M | $54M |
| Dividend Yield | 4.97% | 1.89% |
| Holdings Count | 231 | 106 |
| Inception Date | 2018-04-18 | 2024-09-16 |
| Investment Style | Long Term Mid Quality | Large Cap Blend |
| 1-Month Return | +0.38% | +9.09% |
| YTD Return | +0.43% | +7.70% |
| 1-Year Return | +7.39% | +46.33% |
| 3-Year Return | +4.29% | - |
| 5-Year Return | -0.34% | - |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 70 | 61 |
| Momentum Score | 35 | 74 |
| Value Score | 58 | 50 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, IG or PATN?
IG has an expense ratio of 0.19% while PATN charges 0.65%. IG is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do IG and PATN hold the same stocks?
IG and PATN share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, IG or PATN?
Over the past year, IG returned +7.39% while PATN returned +46.33%. PATN outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.