IG vs SAWS
vs
IG vs SAWS
Principal Investment Grade Corporate Active ETF vs AAM Sawgrass US Small Cap Quality Growth ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
IG has a lower expense ratio. SAWS delivered stronger 1-year returns. IG offers more diversification with 231 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IG | SAWS |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Principal Funds | Advisors Asset Management, Inc. |
| Expense Ratio | 0.19% | 0.55% |
| AUM | $166M | $6M |
| Dividend Yield | 4.97% | 0.02% |
| Holdings Count | 231 | 71 |
| Inception Date | 2018-04-18 | 2024-07-30 |
| Investment Style | Long Term Mid Quality | Small Cap Growth |
| 1-Month Return | +0.38% | +4.06% |
| YTD Return | +0.43% | +3.70% |
| 1-Year Return | +7.39% | +8.69% |
| 3-Year Return | +4.29% | - |
| 5-Year Return | -0.34% | - |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 70 | 66 |
| Momentum Score | 35 | 61 |
| Value Score | 58 | 49 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, IG or SAWS?
IG has an expense ratio of 0.19% while SAWS charges 0.55%. IG is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do IG and SAWS hold the same stocks?
IG and SAWS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, IG or SAWS?
Over the past year, IG returned +7.39% while SAWS returned +8.69%. SAWS outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.