IG vs SCHQ
vs
IG vs SCHQ
Principal Investment Grade Corporate Active ETF vs Schwab Long-Term US Treasury ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
SCHQ has a lower expense ratio. IG delivered stronger 1-year returns. IG offers more diversification with 231 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IG | SCHQ |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Principal Funds | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Expense Ratio | 0.19% | 0.03% |
| AUM | $166M | $923M |
| Dividend Yield | 4.97% | 4.43% |
| Holdings Count | 231 | 97 |
| Inception Date | 2018-04-18 | 2019-10-10 |
| Investment Style | Long Term Mid Quality | Long Term Government Bond |
| 1-Month Return | +0.38% | -0.06% |
| YTD Return | +0.43% | +0.09% |
| 1-Year Return | +7.39% | +4.22% |
| 3-Year Return | +4.29% | -1.99% |
| 5-Year Return | -0.34% | -6.92% |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 70 | 61 |
| Momentum Score | 35 | 25 |
| Value Score | 58 | 73 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, IG or SCHQ?
IG has an expense ratio of 0.19% while SCHQ charges 0.03%. SCHQ is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do IG and SCHQ hold the same stocks?
IG and SCHQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, IG or SCHQ?
Over the past year, IG returned +7.39% while SCHQ returned +4.22%. IG outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.