IGBH vs MFEM
vs
IGBH vs MFEM
iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF vs PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
IGBH has a lower expense ratio. MFEM delivered stronger 1-year returns. MFEM offers more diversification with 693 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IGBH | MFEM |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | PIMCO (US) |
| Expense Ratio | 0.14% | 0.49% |
| AUM | $174M | $127M |
| Dividend Yield | 6.09% | 2.32% |
| Holdings Count | 274 | 772 |
| Inception Date | 2015-07-22 | 2017-08-31 |
| Investment Style | Ultrashort Term Bond | Large Cap Value |
| 1-Month Return | +0.89% | +9.42% |
| YTD Return | +0.85% | +7.98% |
| 1-Year Return | +7.33% | +37.08% |
| 3-Year Return | +7.78% | +15.74% |
| 5-Year Return | +5.04% | +7.46% |
| 10-Year Return | +4.61% | - |
| Buy Score | 60 | 68 |
| Momentum Score | 41 | 79 |
| Value Score | 63 | 53 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
695
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, IGBH or MFEM?
IGBH has an expense ratio of 0.14% while MFEM charges 0.49%. IGBH is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do IGBH and MFEM hold the same stocks?
IGBH and MFEM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 695 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, IGBH or MFEM?
Over the past year, IGBH returned +7.33% while MFEM returned +37.08%. MFEM outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.