IGBH vs PATN
vs
IGBH vs PATN
iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF vs Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
IGBH has a lower expense ratio. PATN delivered stronger 1-year returns. PATN offers more diversification with 101 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IGBH | PATN |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Pacer ETFs |
| Expense Ratio | 0.14% | 0.65% |
| AUM | $174M | $54M |
| Dividend Yield | 6.09% | 1.89% |
| Holdings Count | 274 | 106 |
| Inception Date | 2015-07-22 | 2024-09-16 |
| Investment Style | Ultrashort Term Bond | Large Cap Blend |
| 1-Month Return | +0.89% | +9.09% |
| YTD Return | +0.85% | +7.70% |
| 1-Year Return | +7.33% | +46.33% |
| 3-Year Return | +7.78% | - |
| 5-Year Return | +5.04% | - |
| 10-Year Return | +4.61% | - |
| Buy Score | 60 | 61 |
| Momentum Score | 40 | 72 |
| Value Score | - | 50 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
103
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, IGBH or PATN?
IGBH has an expense ratio of 0.14% while PATN charges 0.65%. IGBH is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do IGBH and PATN hold the same stocks?
IGBH and PATN share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 103 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, IGBH or PATN?
Over the past year, IGBH returned +7.33% while PATN returned +46.33%. PATN outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.