IGBH vs PATN
vs
IGBH vs PATN
iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF vs Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
IGBH has a lower expense ratio. PATN delivered stronger 1-year returns. IGBH offers more diversification with 274 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IGBH | PATN |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Pacer ETFs |
| Expense Ratio | 0.14% | 0.65% |
| AUM | $174M | $54M |
| Dividend Yield | 6.09% | 1.89% |
| Holdings Count | 274 | 106 |
| Inception Date | 2015-07-22 | 2024-09-16 |
| Investment Style | Ultrashort Term Bond | Large Cap Blend |
| 1-Month Return | +0.89% | +9.09% |
| YTD Return | +0.85% | +7.70% |
| 1-Year Return | +7.33% | +46.33% |
| 3-Year Return | +7.78% | - |
| 5-Year Return | +5.04% | - |
| 10-Year Return | +4.61% | - |
| Buy Score | 60 | 61 |
| Momentum Score | 41 | 74 |
| Value Score | 63 | 50 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, IGBH or PATN?
IGBH has an expense ratio of 0.14% while PATN charges 0.65%. IGBH is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do IGBH and PATN hold the same stocks?
IGBH and PATN share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, IGBH or PATN?
Over the past year, IGBH returned +7.33% while PATN returned +46.33%. PATN outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.