INCE vs MFEM

vs

Quick Verdict

INCE has a lower expense ratio. MFEM delivered stronger 1-year returns. MFEM offers more diversification with 693 holdings.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricINCEMFEM
Fund FamilyFranklin Templeton Investments (US)PIMCO (US)
Expense Ratio0.29%0.49%
AUM$108M$127M
Dividend Yield4.95%2.32%
Holdings Count81772
Inception Date2016-09-202017-08-31
Investment StyleLarge Cap ValueLarge Cap Value
1-Month Return+4.05%+9.42%
YTD Return+9.87%+7.98%
1-Year Return+21.86%+37.08%
3-Year Return+17.31%+15.74%
5-Year Return+13.21%+7.46%
10-Year Return--
Buy Score7868
Momentum Score8879
Value Score5953

Holdings Overlap

0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
734
Total Unique

Sector Allocation

Loading chart...

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has lower fees, INCE or MFEM?

INCE has an expense ratio of 0.29% while MFEM charges 0.49%. INCE is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.

Do INCE and MFEM hold the same stocks?

INCE and MFEM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 734 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Which performed better, INCE or MFEM?

Over the past year, INCE returned +21.86% while MFEM returned +37.08%. MFEM outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.