IZRL vs NAN

vs

Quick Verdict

IZRL has a lower expense ratio. IZRL delivered stronger 1-year returns. NAN offers more diversification with 79 holdings.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIZRLNAN
Fund FamilyArk InvestNuveen
Expense Ratio0.49%3.77%
AUM$152M-
Dividend Yield2.55%7.50%
Holdings Count63162
Inception Date2017-12-041999-05-26
Investment StyleSmall Cap GrowthMunicipal New York
1-Month Return-6.80%+1.67%
YTD Return+1.94%+4.39%
1-Year Return+15.44%+11.20%
3-Year Return+18.48%+3.43%
5-Year Return-0.35%-0.93%
10-Year Return-+3.35%
Buy Score5343
Momentum Score3744
Value Score7520

Holdings Overlap

0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
140
Total Unique

Sector Allocation

Loading chart...

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has lower fees, IZRL or NAN?

IZRL has an expense ratio of 0.49% while NAN charges 3.77%. IZRL is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.

Do IZRL and NAN hold the same stocks?

IZRL and NAN share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 140 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Which performed better, IZRL or NAN?

Over the past year, IZRL returned +15.44% while NAN returned +11.20%. IZRL outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.