MFEM vs PATN
vs
MFEM vs PATN
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
MFEM has a lower expense ratio. PATN delivered stronger 1-year returns. MFEM offers more diversification with 772 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MFEM | PATN |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | PIMCO (US) | Pacer ETFs |
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.65% |
| AUM | $127M | $54M |
| Dividend Yield | 2.32% | 1.89% |
| Holdings Count | 772 | 106 |
| Inception Date | 2017-08-31 | 2024-09-16 |
| Investment Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| 1-Month Return | +9.42% | +9.09% |
| YTD Return | +7.98% | +7.70% |
| 1-Year Return | +37.08% | +46.33% |
| 3-Year Return | +15.74% | - |
| 5-Year Return | +7.46% | - |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 68 | 61 |
| Momentum Score | 79 | 74 |
| Value Score | 53 | 50 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, MFEM or PATN?
MFEM has an expense ratio of 0.49% while PATN charges 0.65%. MFEM is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do MFEM and PATN hold the same stocks?
MFEM and PATN share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, MFEM or PATN?
Over the past year, MFEM returned +37.08% while PATN returned +46.33%. PATN outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.