MFEM vs PATN
vs
MFEM vs PATN
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
MFEM has a lower expense ratio. PATN delivered stronger 1-year returns. MFEM offers more diversification with 693 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MFEM | PATN |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | PIMCO (US) | Pacer ETFs |
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.65% |
| AUM | $127M | $54M |
| Dividend Yield | 2.32% | 1.89% |
| Holdings Count | 772 | 106 |
| Inception Date | 2017-08-31 | 2024-09-16 |
| Investment Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| 1-Month Return | +9.42% | +9.09% |
| YTD Return | +7.98% | +7.70% |
| 1-Year Return | +37.08% | +46.33% |
| 3-Year Return | +15.74% | - |
| 5-Year Return | +7.46% | - |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 68 | 61 |
| Momentum Score | 79 | 74 |
| Value Score | 53 | 50 |
Holdings Overlap
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, MFEM or PATN?
MFEM has an expense ratio of 0.49% while PATN charges 0.65%. MFEM is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do MFEM and PATN hold the same stocks?
MFEM and PATN share 13 common holdings with a 6.9% weight overlap. They hold 781 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, MFEM or PATN?
Over the past year, MFEM returned +37.08% while PATN returned +46.33%. PATN outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.