MFEM vs SAWS
vs
MFEM vs SAWS
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs AAM Sawgrass US Small Cap Quality Growth ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
MFEM has a lower expense ratio. MFEM delivered stronger 1-year returns. MFEM offers more diversification with 693 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MFEM | SAWS |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | PIMCO (US) | Advisors Asset Management, Inc. |
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.55% |
| AUM | $127M | $6M |
| Dividend Yield | 2.32% | 0.02% |
| Holdings Count | 772 | 71 |
| Inception Date | 2017-08-31 | 2024-07-30 |
| Investment Style | Large Cap Value | Small Cap Growth |
| 1-Month Return | +9.42% | +4.06% |
| YTD Return | +7.98% | +3.70% |
| 1-Year Return | +37.08% | +8.69% |
| 3-Year Return | +15.74% | - |
| 5-Year Return | +7.46% | - |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 68 | 66 |
| Momentum Score | 75 | 59 |
| Value Score | 53 | - |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
763
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, MFEM or SAWS?
MFEM has an expense ratio of 0.49% while SAWS charges 0.55%. MFEM is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do MFEM and SAWS hold the same stocks?
MFEM and SAWS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 763 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, MFEM or SAWS?
Over the past year, MFEM returned +37.08% while SAWS returned +8.69%. MFEM outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.