MFEM vs SCHQ
vs
MFEM vs SCHQ
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs Schwab Long-Term US Treasury ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
SCHQ has a lower expense ratio. MFEM delivered stronger 1-year returns. MFEM offers more diversification with 772 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MFEM | SCHQ |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | PIMCO (US) | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.03% |
| AUM | $127M | $923M |
| Dividend Yield | 2.32% | 4.43% |
| Holdings Count | 772 | 97 |
| Inception Date | 2017-08-31 | 2019-10-10 |
| Investment Style | Large Cap Value | Long Term Government Bond |
| 1-Month Return | +9.42% | -0.06% |
| YTD Return | +7.98% | +0.09% |
| 1-Year Return | +37.08% | +4.22% |
| 3-Year Return | +15.74% | -1.99% |
| 5-Year Return | +7.46% | -6.92% |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 68 | 61 |
| Momentum Score | 79 | 25 |
| Value Score | 53 | 73 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, MFEM or SCHQ?
MFEM has an expense ratio of 0.49% while SCHQ charges 0.03%. SCHQ is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do MFEM and SCHQ hold the same stocks?
MFEM and SCHQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, MFEM or SCHQ?
Over the past year, MFEM returned +37.08% while SCHQ returned +4.22%. MFEM outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.