MFEM vs SCHQ
vs
MFEM vs SCHQ
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs Schwab Long-Term US Treasury ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
SCHQ has a lower expense ratio. MFEM delivered stronger 1-year returns. MFEM offers more diversification with 693 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MFEM | SCHQ |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | PIMCO (US) | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.03% |
| AUM | $127M | $923M |
| Dividend Yield | 2.32% | 4.43% |
| Holdings Count | 772 | 97 |
| Inception Date | 2017-08-31 | 2019-10-10 |
| Investment Style | Large Cap Value | Long Term Government Bond |
| 1-Month Return | +9.42% | -0.06% |
| YTD Return | +7.98% | +0.09% |
| 1-Year Return | +37.08% | +4.22% |
| 3-Year Return | +15.74% | -1.99% |
| 5-Year Return | +7.46% | -6.92% |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 68 | 61 |
| Momentum Score | 75 | 25 |
| Value Score | 53 | - |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
703
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, MFEM or SCHQ?
MFEM has an expense ratio of 0.49% while SCHQ charges 0.03%. SCHQ is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do MFEM and SCHQ hold the same stocks?
MFEM and SCHQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 703 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, MFEM or SCHQ?
Over the past year, MFEM returned +37.08% while SCHQ returned +4.22%. MFEM outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.