MFEM vs SPGM
vs
MFEM vs SPGM
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs State Street SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
SPGM has a lower expense ratio. MFEM delivered stronger 1-year returns. SPGM offers more diversification with 2843 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MFEM | SPGM |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | PIMCO (US) | SPDR State Street Global Advisors |
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.09% |
| AUM | $145M | $1.8B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.14% | 1.80% |
| Holdings Count | 730 | 2,985 |
| Inception Date | 2017-08-31 | 2012-02-27 |
| Investment Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| 1-Month Return | -5.75% | -0.57% |
| YTD Return | +20.38% | +11.62% |
| 1-Year Return | +36.47% | +26.38% |
| 3-Year Return | +20.04% | +20.15% |
| 5-Year Return | +7.58% | +11.37% |
| 10-Year Return | - | +5.53% |
| Buy Score | 81 | 77 |
| Momentum Score | 84 | 69 |
| Value Score | 52 | 66 |
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, MFEM or SPGM?
MFEM has an expense ratio of 0.49% while SPGM charges 0.09%. SPGM is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do MFEM and SPGM hold the same stocks?
MFEM and SPGM share 146 common holdings with a 2.8% weight overlap. They hold 3396 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, MFEM or SPGM?
Over the past year, MFEM returned +36.47% while SPGM returned +26.38%. MFEM outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.