MFEM vs SPGM
vs
MFEM vs SPGM
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs State Street SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
SPGM has a lower expense ratio. MFEM delivered stronger 1-year returns. SPGM offers more diversification with 2954 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MFEM | SPGM |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | PIMCO (US) | SPDR State Street Global Advisors |
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.09% |
| AUM | $127M | $1.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.32% | 1.80% |
| Holdings Count | 772 | 2,954 |
| Inception Date | 2017-08-31 | 2012-02-27 |
| Investment Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| 1-Month Return | +9.42% | +3.34% |
| YTD Return | +7.98% | +2.71% |
| 1-Year Return | +37.08% | +23.81% |
| 3-Year Return | +15.74% | +19.04% |
| 5-Year Return | +7.46% | +12.35% |
| 10-Year Return | - | +5.47% |
| Buy Score | 68 | 76 |
| Momentum Score | 79 | 59 |
| Value Score | 53 | 71 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, MFEM or SPGM?
MFEM has an expense ratio of 0.49% while SPGM charges 0.09%. SPGM is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do MFEM and SPGM hold the same stocks?
MFEM and SPGM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, MFEM or SPGM?
Over the past year, MFEM returned +37.08% while SPGM returned +23.81%. MFEM outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.