MFEM vs TYLG
vs
MFEM vs TYLG
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
MFEM has a lower expense ratio. MFEM delivered stronger 1-year returns. MFEM offers more diversification with 772 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MFEM | TYLG |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | PIMCO (US) | Global X by mirae Asset |
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.60% |
| AUM | $127M | $12M |
| Dividend Yield | 2.32% | 8.55% |
| Holdings Count | 772 | 74 |
| Inception Date | 2017-08-31 | 2022-11-21 |
| Investment Style | Large Cap Value | Option Writing |
| 1-Month Return | +9.42% | -0.50% |
| YTD Return | +7.98% | -0.71% |
| 1-Year Return | +37.08% | +15.55% |
| 3-Year Return | +15.74% | +22.29% |
| 5-Year Return | +7.46% | - |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 68 | 59 |
| Momentum Score | 79 | 29 |
| Value Score | 53 | 65 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, MFEM or TYLG?
MFEM has an expense ratio of 0.49% while TYLG charges 0.60%. MFEM is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do MFEM and TYLG hold the same stocks?
MFEM and TYLG share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, MFEM or TYLG?
Over the past year, MFEM returned +37.08% while TYLG returned +15.55%. MFEM outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.