MFEM vs TYLG

vs

Quick Verdict

MFEM has a lower expense ratio. MFEM delivered stronger 1-year returns. MFEM offers more diversification with 693 holdings.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricMFEMTYLG
Fund FamilyPIMCO (US)Global X by mirae Asset
Expense Ratio0.49%0.60%
AUM$127M$12M
Dividend Yield2.32%8.55%
Holdings Count77274
Inception Date2017-08-312022-11-21
Investment StyleLarge Cap ValueOption Writing
1-Month Return+9.42%-0.50%
YTD Return+7.98%-0.71%
1-Year Return+37.08%+15.55%
3-Year Return+15.74%+22.29%
5-Year Return+7.46%-
10-Year Return--
Buy Score68-
Momentum Score79-
Value Score53-

Holdings Overlap

0.1%
Weight Overlap
1
Shared Holdings
763
Total Unique

Top Shared Holdings

TickerMFEM WeightTYLG Weight
TEL:SM0.05%0.28%

Sector Allocation

Loading chart...

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has lower fees, MFEM or TYLG?

MFEM has an expense ratio of 0.49% while TYLG charges 0.60%. MFEM is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.

Do MFEM and TYLG hold the same stocks?

MFEM and TYLG share 1 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. They hold 763 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Which performed better, MFEM or TYLG?

Over the past year, MFEM returned +37.08% while TYLG returned +15.55%. MFEM outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.