PATN vs SAWS
vs
PATN vs SAWS
Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF vs AAM Sawgrass US Small Cap Quality Growth ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
SAWS has a lower expense ratio. PATN delivered stronger 1-year returns. PATN offers more diversification with 101 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PATN | SAWS |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Advisors Asset Management, Inc. |
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.55% |
| AUM | $54M | $6M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.89% | 0.02% |
| Holdings Count | 106 | 71 |
| Inception Date | 2024-09-16 | 2024-07-30 |
| Investment Style | Large Cap Blend | Small Cap Growth |
| 1-Month Return | +9.09% | +4.06% |
| YTD Return | +7.70% | +3.70% |
| 1-Year Return | +46.33% | +8.69% |
| 3-Year Return | - | - |
| 5-Year Return | - | - |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 61 | 66 |
| Momentum Score | 74 | 61 |
| Value Score | 50 | 49 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
171
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, PATN or SAWS?
PATN has an expense ratio of 0.65% while SAWS charges 0.55%. SAWS is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do PATN and SAWS hold the same stocks?
PATN and SAWS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 171 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, PATN or SAWS?
Over the past year, PATN returned +46.33% while SAWS returned +8.69%. PATN outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.