PATN vs SCHQ
vs
PATN vs SCHQ
Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF vs Schwab Long-Term US Treasury ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
SCHQ has a lower expense ratio. PATN delivered stronger 1-year returns. PATN offers more diversification with 106 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PATN | SCHQ |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03% |
| AUM | $54M | $923M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.89% | 4.43% |
| Holdings Count | 106 | 97 |
| Inception Date | 2024-09-16 | 2019-10-10 |
| Investment Style | Large Cap Blend | Long Term Government Bond |
| 1-Month Return | +9.09% | -0.06% |
| YTD Return | +7.70% | +0.09% |
| 1-Year Return | +46.33% | +4.22% |
| 3-Year Return | - | -1.99% |
| 5-Year Return | - | -6.92% |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 61 | 61 |
| Momentum Score | 74 | 25 |
| Value Score | 50 | 73 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, PATN or SCHQ?
PATN has an expense ratio of 0.65% while SCHQ charges 0.03%. SCHQ is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do PATN and SCHQ hold the same stocks?
PATN and SCHQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, PATN or SCHQ?
Over the past year, PATN returned +46.33% while SCHQ returned +4.22%. PATN outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.