PATN vs SCHQ
vs
PATN vs SCHQ
Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF vs Schwab Long-Term US Treasury ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
SCHQ has a lower expense ratio. PATN delivered stronger 1-year returns. PATN offers more diversification with 101 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PATN | SCHQ |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03% |
| AUM | $54M | $923M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.89% | 4.43% |
| Holdings Count | 106 | 97 |
| Inception Date | 2024-09-16 | 2019-10-10 |
| Investment Style | Large Cap Blend | Long Term Government Bond |
| 1-Month Return | +9.09% | -0.06% |
| YTD Return | +7.70% | +0.09% |
| 1-Year Return | +46.33% | +4.22% |
| 3-Year Return | - | -1.99% |
| 5-Year Return | - | -6.92% |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 61 | 61 |
| Momentum Score | 74 | 25 |
| Value Score | 50 | 73 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
111
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, PATN or SCHQ?
PATN has an expense ratio of 0.65% while SCHQ charges 0.03%. SCHQ is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do PATN and SCHQ hold the same stocks?
PATN and SCHQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 111 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, PATN or SCHQ?
Over the past year, PATN returned +46.33% while SCHQ returned +4.22%. PATN outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.