PATN vs TLTP

vs

Quick Verdict

TLTP has a lower expense ratio. PATN delivered stronger 1-year returns. PATN offers more diversification with 106 holdings.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricPATNTLTP
Fund FamilyPacer ETFsAmplify ETFs
Expense Ratio0.65%0.39%
AUM$54M$29M
Dividend Yield1.89%12.19%
Holdings Count1064
Inception Date2024-09-162024-10-29
Investment StyleLarge Cap BlendMulti Alternative
1-Month Return+9.09%-0.50%
YTD Return+7.70%-0.27%
1-Year Return+46.33%+4.33%
3-Year Return--
5-Year Return--
10-Year Return--
Buy Score6156
Momentum Score7423
Value Score50-

Holdings Overlap

0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique

Sector Allocation

Loading chart...

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has lower fees, PATN or TLTP?

PATN has an expense ratio of 0.65% while TLTP charges 0.39%. TLTP is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.

Do PATN and TLTP hold the same stocks?

PATN and TLTP share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Which performed better, PATN or TLTP?

Over the past year, PATN returned +46.33% while TLTP returned +4.33%. PATN outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.