PATN vs TLTP

vs

Quick Verdict

TLTP has a lower expense ratio. PATN delivered stronger 1-year returns. PATN offers more diversification with 101 holdings.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricPATNTLTP
Fund FamilyPacer ETFsAmplify ETFs
Expense Ratio0.65%0.39%
AUM$54M$29M
Dividend Yield1.89%12.19%
Holdings Count1064
Inception Date2024-09-162024-10-29
Investment StyleLarge Cap BlendMulti Alternative
1-Month Return+9.09%-0.50%
YTD Return+7.70%-0.27%
1-Year Return+46.33%+4.33%
3-Year Return--
5-Year Return--
10-Year Return--
Buy Score6156
Momentum Score7223
Value Score50-

Holdings Overlap

0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
104
Total Unique

Sector Allocation

Loading chart...

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has lower fees, PATN or TLTP?

PATN has an expense ratio of 0.65% while TLTP charges 0.39%. TLTP is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.

Do PATN and TLTP hold the same stocks?

PATN and TLTP share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 104 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Which performed better, PATN or TLTP?

Over the past year, PATN returned +46.33% while TLTP returned +4.33%. PATN outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.