PATN vs TYLG
vs
PATN vs TYLG
Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF vs Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
TYLG has a lower expense ratio. PATN delivered stronger 1-year returns. PATN offers more diversification with 101 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PATN | TYLG |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Global X by mirae Asset |
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.60% |
| AUM | $54M | $12M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.89% | 8.55% |
| Holdings Count | 106 | 74 |
| Inception Date | 2024-09-16 | 2022-11-21 |
| Investment Style | Large Cap Blend | Option Writing |
| 1-Month Return | +9.09% | -0.50% |
| YTD Return | +7.70% | -0.71% |
| 1-Year Return | +46.33% | +15.55% |
| 3-Year Return | - | +22.29% |
| 5-Year Return | - | - |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 61 | 59 |
| Momentum Score | 74 | 29 |
| Value Score | 50 | 65 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
172
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, PATN or TYLG?
PATN has an expense ratio of 0.65% while TYLG charges 0.60%. TYLG is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do PATN and TYLG hold the same stocks?
PATN and TYLG share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 172 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, PATN or TYLG?
Over the past year, PATN returned +46.33% while TYLG returned +15.55%. PATN outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.