PATN vs TYLG
vs
PATN vs TYLG
Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF vs Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
TYLG has a lower expense ratio. PATN delivered stronger 1-year returns. PATN offers more diversification with 106 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PATN | TYLG |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Global X by mirae Asset |
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.60% |
| AUM | $54M | $12M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.89% | 8.55% |
| Holdings Count | 106 | 74 |
| Inception Date | 2024-09-16 | 2022-11-21 |
| Investment Style | Large Cap Blend | Option Writing |
| 1-Month Return | +9.09% | -0.50% |
| YTD Return | +7.70% | -0.71% |
| 1-Year Return | +46.33% | +15.55% |
| 3-Year Return | - | +22.29% |
| 5-Year Return | - | - |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 61 | 59 |
| Momentum Score | 74 | 29 |
| Value Score | 50 | 65 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, PATN or TYLG?
PATN has an expense ratio of 0.65% while TYLG charges 0.60%. TYLG is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do PATN and TYLG hold the same stocks?
PATN and TYLG share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, PATN or TYLG?
Over the past year, PATN returned +46.33% while TYLG returned +15.55%. PATN outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.