PHDG vs TYLG
vs
PHDG vs TYLG
Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF vs Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
PHDG has a lower expense ratio. TYLG delivered stronger 1-year returns. PHDG offers more diversification with 513 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PHDG | TYLG |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Global X by mirae Asset |
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.60% |
| AUM | $65M | $12M |
| Dividend Yield | 2.06% | 8.55% |
| Holdings Count | 513 | 74 |
| Inception Date | 2012-12-05 | 2022-11-21 |
| Investment Style | All Cap Blend | Option Writing |
| 1-Month Return | +0.30% | -0.50% |
| YTD Return | +1.71% | -0.71% |
| 1-Year Return | +3.17% | +15.55% |
| 3-Year Return | +7.51% | +22.29% |
| 5-Year Return | +4.00% | - |
| 10-Year Return | +6.36% | - |
| Buy Score | 71 | 59 |
| Momentum Score | 41 | 29 |
| Value Score | 57 | 65 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, PHDG or TYLG?
PHDG has an expense ratio of 0.39% while TYLG charges 0.60%. PHDG is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do PHDG and TYLG hold the same stocks?
PHDG and TYLG share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, PHDG or TYLG?
Over the past year, PHDG returned +3.17% while TYLG returned +15.55%. TYLG outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.