PHDG vs TYLG
vs
PHDG vs TYLG
Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF vs Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
PHDG has a lower expense ratio. TYLG delivered stronger 1-year returns. PHDG offers more diversification with 484 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PHDG | TYLG |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Global X by mirae Asset |
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.60% |
| AUM | $65M | $12M |
| Dividend Yield | 2.06% | 8.55% |
| Holdings Count | 513 | 74 |
| Inception Date | 2012-12-05 | 2022-11-21 |
| Investment Style | All Cap Blend | Option Writing |
| 1-Month Return | +0.30% | -0.50% |
| YTD Return | +1.71% | -0.71% |
| 1-Year Return | +3.17% | +15.55% |
| 3-Year Return | +7.51% | +22.29% |
| 5-Year Return | +4.00% | - |
| 10-Year Return | +6.36% | - |
| Buy Score | 71 | 59 |
| Momentum Score | 41 | 29 |
| Value Score | 57 | 65 |
Holdings Overlap
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, PHDG or TYLG?
PHDG has an expense ratio of 0.39% while TYLG charges 0.60%. PHDG is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do PHDG and TYLG hold the same stocks?
PHDG and TYLG share 66 common holdings with a 24.1% weight overlap. They hold 489 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, PHDG or TYLG?
Over the past year, PHDG returned +3.17% while TYLG returned +15.55%. TYLG outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.