SAWS vs SCHQ
vs
SAWS vs SCHQ
AAM Sawgrass US Small Cap Quality Growth ETF vs Schwab Long-Term US Treasury ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
SCHQ has a lower expense ratio. SAWS delivered stronger 1-year returns. SAWS offers more diversification with 70 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SAWS | SCHQ |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Advisors Asset Management, Inc. | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.03% |
| AUM | $6M | $923M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.02% | 4.43% |
| Holdings Count | 71 | 97 |
| Inception Date | 2024-07-30 | 2019-10-10 |
| Investment Style | Small Cap Growth | Long Term Government Bond |
| 1-Month Return | +4.06% | -0.06% |
| YTD Return | +3.70% | +0.09% |
| 1-Year Return | +8.69% | +4.22% |
| 3-Year Return | - | -1.99% |
| 5-Year Return | - | -6.92% |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 66 | 61 |
| Momentum Score | 59 | 25 |
| Value Score | - | - |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
80
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, SAWS or SCHQ?
SAWS has an expense ratio of 0.55% while SCHQ charges 0.03%. SCHQ is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do SAWS and SCHQ hold the same stocks?
SAWS and SCHQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 80 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, SAWS or SCHQ?
Over the past year, SAWS returned +8.69% while SCHQ returned +4.22%. SAWS outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.