SAWS vs TYLG
vs
SAWS vs TYLG
AAM Sawgrass US Small Cap Quality Growth ETF vs Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
SAWS has a lower expense ratio. TYLG delivered stronger 1-year returns. TYLG offers more diversification with 71 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SAWS | TYLG |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Advisors Asset Management, Inc. | Global X by mirae Asset |
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.60% |
| AUM | $6M | $12M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.02% | 8.55% |
| Holdings Count | 71 | 74 |
| Inception Date | 2024-07-30 | 2022-11-21 |
| Investment Style | Small Cap Growth | Option Writing |
| 1-Month Return | +4.06% | -0.50% |
| YTD Return | +3.70% | -0.71% |
| 1-Year Return | +8.69% | +15.55% |
| 3-Year Return | - | +22.29% |
| 5-Year Return | - | - |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 66 | 59 |
| Momentum Score | 59 | 30 |
| Value Score | - | 65 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
141
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, SAWS or TYLG?
SAWS has an expense ratio of 0.55% while TYLG charges 0.60%. SAWS is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do SAWS and TYLG hold the same stocks?
SAWS and TYLG share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 141 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, SAWS or TYLG?
Over the past year, SAWS returned +8.69% while TYLG returned +15.55%. TYLG outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.