SAWS vs TYLG
vs
SAWS vs TYLG
AAM Sawgrass US Small Cap Quality Growth ETF vs Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
SAWS has a lower expense ratio. TYLG delivered stronger 1-year returns. TYLG offers more diversification with 74 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SAWS | TYLG |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Advisors Asset Management, Inc. | Global X by mirae Asset |
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.60% |
| AUM | $6M | $12M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.02% | 8.55% |
| Holdings Count | 71 | 74 |
| Inception Date | 2024-07-30 | 2022-11-21 |
| Investment Style | Small Cap Growth | Option Writing |
| 1-Month Return | +4.06% | -0.50% |
| YTD Return | +3.70% | -0.71% |
| 1-Year Return | +8.69% | +15.55% |
| 3-Year Return | - | +22.29% |
| 5-Year Return | - | - |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 66 | 59 |
| Momentum Score | 61 | 29 |
| Value Score | 49 | 65 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, SAWS or TYLG?
SAWS has an expense ratio of 0.55% while TYLG charges 0.60%. SAWS is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do SAWS and TYLG hold the same stocks?
SAWS and TYLG share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, SAWS or TYLG?
Over the past year, SAWS returned +8.69% while TYLG returned +15.55%. TYLG outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.