SCHQ vs TLTP
vs
SCHQ vs TLTP
Schwab Long-Term US Treasury ETF vs Amplify TLT US Treasury 12% Option Income ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
SCHQ has a lower expense ratio. TLTP delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHQ offers more diversification with 10 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SCHQ | TLTP |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Charles Schwab Asset Management | Amplify ETFs |
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.39% |
| AUM | $923M | $29M |
| Dividend Yield | 4.43% | 12.19% |
| Holdings Count | 97 | 4 |
| Inception Date | 2019-10-10 | 2024-10-29 |
| Investment Style | Long Term Government Bond | Multi Alternative |
| 1-Month Return | -0.06% | -0.50% |
| YTD Return | +0.09% | -0.27% |
| 1-Year Return | +4.22% | +4.33% |
| 3-Year Return | -1.99% | - |
| 5-Year Return | -6.92% | - |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 61 | 56 |
| Momentum Score | 25 | 23 |
| Value Score | - | - |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
13
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, SCHQ or TLTP?
SCHQ has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TLTP charges 0.39%. SCHQ is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do SCHQ and TLTP hold the same stocks?
SCHQ and TLTP share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 13 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, SCHQ or TLTP?
Over the past year, SCHQ returned +4.22% while TLTP returned +4.33%. TLTP outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.