SCHQ vs TYLG
vs
SCHQ vs TYLG
Schwab Long-Term US Treasury ETF vs Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
SCHQ has a lower expense ratio. TYLG delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHQ offers more diversification with 98 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SCHQ | TYLG |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Charles Schwab Asset Management | Global X by mirae Asset |
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.60% |
| AUM | $756M | $15M |
| Dividend Yield | 4.73% | 7.86% |
| Holdings Count | 98 | 77 |
| Inception Date | 2019-10-10 | 2022-11-21 |
| Investment Style | Long Term Government Bond | Option Writing |
| 1-Month Return | +1.03% | +0.28% |
| YTD Return | +0.99% | +22.13% |
| 1-Year Return | +2.87% | +38.91% |
| 3-Year Return | -0.50% | +23.14% |
| 5-Year Return | -5.65% | - |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 66 | 81 |
| Momentum Score | 25 | 86 |
| Value Score | - | 48 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
74
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, SCHQ or TYLG?
SCHQ has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TYLG charges 0.60%. SCHQ is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do SCHQ and TYLG hold the same stocks?
SCHQ and TYLG share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 74 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, SCHQ or TYLG?
Over the past year, SCHQ returned +2.87% while TYLG returned +38.91%. TYLG outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.