SCHQ vs TYLG
vs
SCHQ vs TYLG
Schwab Long-Term US Treasury ETF vs Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
SCHQ has a lower expense ratio. TYLG delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHQ offers more diversification with 97 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SCHQ | TYLG |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Charles Schwab Asset Management | Global X by mirae Asset |
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.60% |
| AUM | $923M | $12M |
| Dividend Yield | 4.43% | 8.55% |
| Holdings Count | 97 | 74 |
| Inception Date | 2019-10-10 | 2022-11-21 |
| Investment Style | Long Term Government Bond | Option Writing |
| 1-Month Return | -0.06% | -0.50% |
| YTD Return | +0.09% | -0.71% |
| 1-Year Return | +4.22% | +15.55% |
| 3-Year Return | -1.99% | +22.29% |
| 5-Year Return | -6.92% | - |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 61 | 59 |
| Momentum Score | 25 | 29 |
| Value Score | 73 | 65 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, SCHQ or TYLG?
SCHQ has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TYLG charges 0.60%. SCHQ is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do SCHQ and TYLG hold the same stocks?
SCHQ and TYLG share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, SCHQ or TYLG?
Over the past year, SCHQ returned +4.22% while TYLG returned +15.55%. TYLG outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.