AVSE vs AWF
Avantis Responsible Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund
Quick Verdict
AVSE has a lower expense ratio. AVSE delivered stronger 1-year returns. AVSE offers more diversification with 1526 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AVSE | AWF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.33% | 1.00% | |
| AUM | $210M | $969M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.27% | 6.92% | |
| Holdings | 4,803 | 1,273 | |
| YTD Return | +16.81% | -0.83% | |
| 1Y Return | +32.29% | -2.37% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.70% | +8.50% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +3.66% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.3% | 18.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -26.3% | -60.0% | |
| Fund Family | Avantis Investors | AllianceBernstein L.P. | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | Mar 28, 2022 | Jul 28, 1993 |
AVSE vs AWF Performance
Avantis Responsible Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVSE) is a ETF from Avantis Investors and AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund (AWF) is a ETF from AllianceBernstein L.P.. Over the past year AVSE returned +32.29% while AWF returned -2.37%. Year to date, AVSE is up 16.81% versus a loss of 0.83% for AWF.
Over three years, AVSE compounded at +22.70% per year against +8.50% for AWF. Across the full 4-year window we track, AVSE has the edge at +13.15% annualized vs +0.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AVSE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.3% compared with 18.2% for AWF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -26.3% for AVSE and -60.0% for AWF. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.55. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AVSE charges 0.33% per year while AWF charges 1.00%. On a $10,000 position that is $33 vs $100 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AVSE currently yields 1.27% against 6.92% for AWF.
Holdings Overlap
AVSE and AWF share 0 holdings out of 2233 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AVSE or AWF?
AVSE has an expense ratio of 0.33% while AWF charges 1.00%. AVSE is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $67 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AVSE or AWF?
Over the past year AVSE returned +32.29% vs -2.37% for AWF, so AVSE leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), AVSE annualized +13.15% vs +0.92% for AWF. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AVSE or AWF?
AVSE has been the more volatile fund at 18.3% annualized versus 18.2% for AWF. Worst drawdown: AVSE -26.3% vs AWF -60.0%.
Should I hold both AVSE and AWF?
AVSE and AWF have a monthly-return correlation of 0.55, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AVSE and AWF?
AVSE and AWF share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2233 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AVSE or AWF?
AVSE yields 1.27% while AWF yields 6.92%, so AWF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.