AVSE vs NMI

Quick Verdict

AVSE has a lower expense ratio. AVSE delivered stronger 1-year returns. AVSE offers more diversification with 1526 holdings.

Lower Fees: AVSEHigher Returns: AVSEMore Diversified: AVSE

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAVSENMIWinner
Expense Ratio0.33%0.73%
AUM$210M-
Dividend Yield1.27%4.57%
Holdings4,803220
YTD Return+18.68%+11.00%
1Y Return+32.87%+14.29%
3Y Return (annualized)+23.33%+9.76%
5Y Return (annualized)-+2.10%
Volatility (annualized)18.4%11.0%
Max Drawdown-26.3%-34.4%
Fund FamilyAvantis InvestorsNuveen
CategoryEquityTax Preferred
InceptionMar 28, 2022Apr 20, 1988

AVSE vs NMI Performance

Avantis Responsible Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVSE) is a ETF from Avantis Investors and Nuveen Municipal Income Fund Inc. (NMI) is a ETF from Nuveen. Over the past year AVSE returned +32.87% while NMI returned +14.29%. Year to date, AVSE is up 18.68% versus a gain of 11.00% for NMI.

Over three years, AVSE compounded at +23.33% per year against +9.76% for NMI. Across the full 4-year window we track, AVSE has the edge at +13.55% annualized vs +0.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

AVSE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.4% compared with 11.0% for NMI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -26.3% for AVSE and -34.4% for NMI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.46. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.

Fees and Cost Over Time

AVSE charges 0.33% per year while NMI charges 0.73%. On a $10,000 position that is $33 vs $73 annually, a gap of $40 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AVSE currently yields 1.27% against 4.57% for NMI.

Holdings Overlap

0.0%overlap

AVSE and NMI share 0 holdings out of 1621 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, AVSE or NMI?

AVSE has an expense ratio of 0.33% while NMI charges 0.73%. AVSE is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $40 per year of difference.

Which performed better, AVSE or NMI?

Over the past year AVSE returned +32.87% vs +14.29% for NMI, so AVSE leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), AVSE annualized +13.55% vs +0.37% for NMI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, AVSE or NMI?

AVSE has been the more volatile fund at 18.4% annualized versus 11.0% for NMI. Worst drawdown: AVSE -26.3% vs NMI -34.4%.

Should I hold both AVSE and NMI?

AVSE and NMI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.46, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between AVSE and NMI?

AVSE and NMI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1621 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, AVSE or NMI?

AVSE yields 1.27% while NMI yields 4.57%, so NMI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.